Dear Experts,
I have a problem in J3AT AFS. for example: SO1 is 10 PCs, SO 2 is 100 PCs. the inventory is 100 PCs.
After i had done J3AT for SO1, the available inventory = 100 - 10 = 90 PCs. but when i did J3AT fot SO2, the availabel qty is 100 PCs , The available qty should be 90 PCs for SO2. how to fix the problem?
thanks in advance.
Coliin
Hi, All.
I'm new in SAP Retail so my questions could be silly, but I hope that you can help me or show right direction.
I've created assortment and assigned plants and merchandise groups to it.
I've created standart assortment module (WSO1) and assign it to assortment.
When I'm adding new article to assortment module using different listing procedures (01, 02, 06) I expect that listing conditions will be created by system automatically. But this doesn't happen (there is no records in WLK1 table).
I tried to create my own listing procedure in customizing (see it in screenshot) but it doesn't work too.
I'm afraid that there is some mistakes in my customizing. Could you please explain me some points from IMG help. Here I've found:
- "Ensure that you define plant material group assignment correctly and completely, including defining the correct assortment grade."
Is it obligatory to use assortment grade if I set check-box "No astmt garde" in my own listing procedure?
- "Ensure that the plants are correctly classified for the purposes of comparison with the material"
I don't use in my listing procedure check ""K" - Material <-> plant classification check". Is it obligatory to classify plants?
Message was edited by: Alexander Mikhailovich Drozd
Hello Everyone!
We noticed that the data passing through our PI system to the POSDM system is taking too long to process. As was discussed with our non-SAP POS system, they will send 2,000 XML files every 5 minutes to the FTP in order for PI to process it and send to POSDM.
We got all the start times of the messages (as I assume this is the time it took PI to get the files from the FTP server) and it only took 1 minute and 44 seconds to finish. But if we look at the end times of the messages after the third transaction, it would take more than 2 seconds to finish. Note that the screenshot below is only the first 15 messages out of 2,000 messages from PI:
We checked our service interfaces if it was set to synchronous as this might cause the delay but, they were already set to asynchronous. We also checked our mapping if there's any customized program but we only used standard functions. The transfer protocol used in the PI to POSDM communication channel is through RFC, calling the standard BAPI /POSDW/BAPI_POSTR_CREATE.
We were thinking if the standard BAPI program in POSDM can only take one XML file at a time?
Is there anything else we failed to check out?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
Hi,
We are working with Is retail,we never use Final Price,Gross Selling Price,Net selling Price.
We does not require these values.
We determining pricing procedure in SD route
Sales Area+Cust Pricing Procedure+Doc Pricing Procedure.
We create article using LSMW,we get struck in Sales View ,we need to click enter.We dont know which way system picks WWS001 as pricing procedure .
We get the below error,
Unauthorized change in the existing price calculation
Message no. WV106
Diagnosis
In sales price calculation maintenance you have changed fields in such a way that the system is no longer able to calculate the sales price (or the retail price in the second pricing step). You cannot, for example, change the margin and the actual markup simultaneously in a sales price calculation, as these two entries can have a conflicting effect on the way the sales price is calculated.
System Response
All the changes you made to the existing pricing item were reset to the original entries.
Procedure
Re-enter your data for the current pricing item.
To continue editing the pricing table
We need not want system to calculate Final Price,Gross Selling Price,Net selling Price,it is of no use to us,i request to help me,how to over come this error.Even we need to determine pricing procedure.
Morning, looking for some advice on stock take processes within a retail store, we've got 170 Stores with a SKU count of about active 80K...at the moment we do the following, Count, Create PID, Post PID, run variance report
Dear Retail Experts,
We have recently activated the new bonus buy screen, transaction RDMBBY01. The issue is that we try to enter quantity scales in the get side of the bonus buy but the system always defaults scale type to 'Equal' and it is always dimmed even if single article is entered and the condition type is configured as quantity scale 'C'
Can you please suggest how quantity scales can be entered in this screen?
Hi,
I am little surprised how do the system picks Sales Price schema.
Even i have not maintained Assign pricing type to organisational level.
But while creating article master i am getting Net Sales Price,Gross Sales Price ,Final Price as 408,which is the value in enter in Purchasing view to Net Price.
I am surprised how system picks pricing procedure WWS001.
Also when i see into analysis part,it shows Condition type EKNN is manually entered.
How does EKNN picks value
Thanks,
Pradeep M
Hi everyone!
We're trying to automate the outbound task in POSDM found under the two-step processing which will enable sending of sales data and means of payment data to be sent via WPUUMS and WPUTAB respectively.
I understand we can create a variant for the program /posdw/odis but we must have a condition where the total records EOD must be successful (task 0030) before the outbound task should be executed. Is this possible under configuration?
Thanks!
Hello.
Currently we using Intra Company Stock Transport Orders to move goods from plant to plant. We using movement types (641/101) to move the goods.
However, the BW team is reporting difficulties reporting SIT (Stock In Transit) at the AFS batch/size level because both the MSEG-CHARG and MSEG-J_3ASIZE fields are blank in the auto generated 641 movement.
BW team is asking whether through ABAP enhancements the MSEG-CHARG and MSEG-J_3ASIZE field can be updated with the receiving batches/sizes.
My questions are:
Is updating MSEG-CHARG and MSEG-J_3ASIZE a valid request?
Or perhaps updating the extract structure for the following fields is a better approach:
MSEG-UMCHA (receiving batch)
MSEG-J_3AUMSI (receiving size)
Hello everyone,
Can anyone please let me know , what are the reasons or situations that can cause exhausted budget to acquire a negative value in OTB process .
Exhausted budget is only the amount that we have consumed (while creating PO for procurement) , how it can be negative ?
I am new to the seasonal procurement and Open-to-Buy process.
It would be really nice if anyone can help with this.
Thanks.
Regards,
Aadhya.
Good Day,
Config for article status F gives an error message for Purchasing. We want to block Vendor Procurement with articles for status F but not Stock Transfer Orders. As Stock transfer orders are not external procurement why would we get the error message below
Hi Everyone,
We have a scenario on our regular sales with an erroneous article in the receipt (incomplete Master Data, from our non-SAP POS system):
As this scenario with the Master Data happens often, and the amounts here in the receipt are not aggregated, we want the task for checking the balance for the totals transactions (0030) to not include all of the items in the receipt with an erroneous status.
Do I have to void these transactions first? Or is there any setting in the configuration to exclude erroneous transactions for the balance of total transactions?
Thank you in advance
Good Day,
The profit centre for an article and site on table MARC differs to the correct profit centre assignment on the article master itself.
Only if I remove the storage location in transaction MM42 and add it back again does the profit centre update on MARC.
Does anyone know why this would happen?
Regards
Lindsay
How do we configure to post to different GL Accounts based on different Sales Item Types when using WPUBON ?
I tried using the Conversion customising setting but it did not seems to called when I process the IDOC.
Any ideas ?
Hi Experts,
Can some one please help me on this.
We have to maintain partner profile for 200 customers, so is there any other way where to maintain them in single shot apart from WE20 and SALE transaction codes.
Regards,
Lloyd
I have seen the MB5B/MC.9 for AFS materials that shows inventory but not grid wise.
There is option in MB5B to check the stock in batches.
in Setting check the "Only Matls handled in batches"
But report is coming in verify distorted formal. As 1 grid whole table is creating. Cant use for inventory purpose.
Is there option to get the Inventory in more readable format.
Hi, everyone:
Our SAP version ECC6.0/P3A 600 0003 IS-AFS (Apparel & Footwear Solution)
Our PO GR using MB01, because the same material have difference grid value therefore batch is difference.
But using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE always error, this problem may be resolved?
Best Regards,
Nicole Chen
Good Day,
I cannot enter a picking quantity in an outbound delivery as the column is greyed out.
Previously the incorrect pricing procedure for the customer site was missing, when this was fixed the column opened up.
Now the column is still greyed out even though this pricing procedure for the customer site is correct.
Does anyone know what other reasons there may be behind this?
Regards
Lindsay
Hi,
We installed SAP CAR on HANA for third party integration (transactional data). Now i Need some configuration document and other documents related to sap car on hana and also the all tcode used in CAR.
Is sapcar configuration is same like sap posdm using posdw/img for transaction data?
Thanks,
abaper
Good Day,
When changing an article status in transaction MM46 from status D (DISCONTINUED) to M (MANDATORY) the system gives the error:
There are still open purchase order items or scheduling agreements
I have tried to manually change the status in MM42 but I get the same error.
Why would an article status change only be allowed when there are no open PO's and Scheduling agreements.
I understand the impact of changing profit centres and there are open orders/
Regards
Lindsay